|
The Editors Inquisition - Post Match
Adi Mowles. Ancient (48) Customer Service Manager for bank
Give us a brief synopsis of the game?
Superb start from POSH and we deservedly went ahead with an excellently worked goal. Could and should have gone two up before half time. City pushed on second half but we defended well until conceding silly first goal. Both sides then attacked, though we did it on the break more and another bad goal to lose finished it. Superb entertainment and a credit to both teams.
Was the result a fair reflection on the game?
I'm hardly likely to say yes! Seriously though, I really feel that it wasn't and think a neutral would agree.
What do you feel was the moment which turned the game?
The silly first goal which should have been no threat except for the fact our keeper and full back decided they didn't want a win in case we had to travel even further in the second round.
Who was man of the match?
For us, George Boyd. For you, Lee Trundle purely for his banter on the sideline.
Does the game change your opinion of how Peterborough will fair this season?
No. I knew we could play football, and worried the slightly higher standard wouldn't see us score so freely.
After this, how do you think City will do?
I hope they do one better than last season, as I liked the way they too tried to play football. They just weren't as good at it as POSH :)
(By the way good luck to young Ribiero after what looked a bad 'un)
(By the way good luck to young Ribiero after what looked a bad 'un)
If you could buy any of City's players which one would it be?
Well it wouldn't be Maynard! Probably Booker, not brilliant last night but something we haven't got up front. Possibly Lee Trundle as George Boyds understudy.
Give us your thoughts on Peterborough for the rest of the League One season... We'll be ok, possibly push for play off place and if we do get through then great as unlike some we have never lost at Wembley...